🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."